| DATE: |
September 12, 2005
|
| MEMORANDUM TO: |
Stephen M. Beard |
| Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Audits |
| Office of the Inspector General
|
| FROM: | Frederick S. Selby |
| Director
|
| SUBJECT: |
Response to the OIG Draft Report Entitled The FDIC’s |
| Management of Travel Costs (Assignment No. 2005-027)
|
We appreciate the evaluation and recommendations by the OIG contained in the draft report
entitled, “The FDIC’s Management of Travel Costs” issued August 16, 2005. The Division of
Finance (DOF) welcomes the opportunity to continually improve management of travel costs
whenever possible.
The above referenced report included five (5) recommendations. Below please find each
recommendation followed by DOF’s response.
OIG Recommendation #1: Evaluate reinstating the FDIC’s travel policy requiring mandatory
use of the national travel agency for making hotel reservations while conducting examinations of
financial institutions.
Management Response: DOF has given considerable thought to reinstating the policy requiring
mandatory use of the national travel agency by the Division of Supervision and Consumer
Protection (DSC) travelers conducting examinations of financial institutions, and is keenly aware
of the financial impact of the decision to indefinitely suspend this policy. However, given the
numerous complaints made by DSC examiners as well as the negative impact this policy had on
morale among DSC examiners, DOF does not intend to reinstate the policy at this time.
DSC represents DOF’s largest customer base. Therefore, a primary goal of DOF travel programs
must be to meet the needs of this group. Most examiners stay at small hotels in rural areas that
are not listed in the computer reservation systems used by travel agencies to make reservations
and typically do not offer commissions, Therefore, if SatoTravel is used to make reservations at
these properties, the traveler must either wait to receive an e-mail confirmation from the agent or
hold on the phone while the agent locates the number to the property and then calls and makes a
reservation. Given the limited access to e-mails that can exist while examiners are at a bank.
checking e-mail to see if a reservation has been made is not a viable option.
Additionally, holding on the phone also is not making the best use of an examiner’s time when
the examiner can call the property directly and make a reservation in less time. While it is true
that suspending the referenced policy has resulted in an overall increase in the cost to administer
the national travel agency program[ 1 ], the increased cost is not significant enough to warrant the
additional time examiners would have to spend making hotel reservations through SatoTravel or
the increase in customer complaints and declining morale that would result from a reinstatement
of this policy. We do not believe that re-instating this policy would be in the best interest of
customer service and DSC concurs with our evaluation.
OIG Recommendation #2: Encourage FDIC travelers to use hotels that offer commissions for
all lodging reservations.
Management Response: We concur with this recommendation. DOF cannot mandate the use
of such hotels without first satisfying its collective bargaining obligations. However, DOF can
certainly encourage travelers to use hotels that offer commissions via a global e-mail advising
travelers of the benefits of booking commissionable properties. In addition, if the new online
reservation system is implemented, the global e-mail announcing its implementation will include
information on how to identify and select SatoTravel hotel rates. SatoTravel rates are special
rates negotiated by SatoTravel with individual hotels. These rates are all at or below per diem
and are always commissionable. A global e-mail advising travelers of the benefits of using
commissionable properties will be transmitted by October 28, 2005.
Implementation of the online booking tool is contingent upon the results of the test which begins
on September 12th and will last approximately 60 days. RESX is the product currently under
consideration. If the test is successful, the product will be implemented throughout FDIC.
OIG Recommendation #3: Provide information, guidance, and training to FDIC employees to
ensure that they understand how to use SatoTravel’s online reservation system and its
capabilities so that FDIC can increase usage of the system.
Management Response: We concur with this recommendation. As noted in the audit report,
DOF is currently evaluating RESX, an online reservation system being offered to FDIC by
SatoTravel. If the decision is made to implement RESX, a user guide (which has already been
developed) will be posted on the DOF travel web site. Travelers will be advised via global e-
mail to read the user guide prior to making reservations in the online system. In addition, a help
desk number and e-mail address will be provided to FDIC travelers. General information and
usage tips will be provided to travelers in the global e-mail. This information also will be posted
on the DOF travel web site.
Completion of this task is contingent upon the successful testing and implementation of RESX,
the online reservation system currently under consideration by DOF, but we anticipate the online
system to be implemented before December 31, 2005.
OIG Recommendation #4: Conduct an analysis to determine the cost-benefit of making the
government travel card mandatory for all FDIC travel.
Management Response: We concur with this recommendation. DOF will work with Bank of
America to determine the cost benefit of making the government travel card mandatory for all
FDIC travel. If the analysis shows a financial benefit sufficient to warrant a policy change, such
a change could not be implemented until DOF met its collective bargaining obligations. Initial
estimates indicate that the resulting increase in rebates would not be sufficient to warrant a
change in policy that is likely to be detrimental to the morale of FDIC travelers. DOF will
complete this analysis by January 31, 2006.
OIG Recommendation #5: Research GSA’s eTravel program to determine whether the
program could improve or replace the FDIC’s current travel program.
Management Response: We concur with this recommendation. A process improvement study
of the travel processing system has already been planned for 2006. The study will review the
benefits of each of GSA’s eTtavel programs. GSA offers three separate programs which were
developed by three outside contractors, EDS, CWGT, and Northrup Grumman. In addition to
the GSA programs, the study will review other commercial travel processing systems. Our
existing Electronic Travel Voucher System (ETV) will also be studied to determine the
feasibility of adding those capabilities that are available on GSA’s programs which are not
available on ETV. Those capabilities include:
- A Travel Reservation Module;
- Web-based accessibility;
- Split Payment Processing. This is the ability to designate which portion of a travel
voucher reimbursement should be paid directly to the travel credit card company and
which portion should be paid directly to the employee.
Once this study has been completed, estimated to be by September 30, 2006, a recommendation
will be made to management on which approach best meets the needs of the FDIC.
| cc: | Steve App |
| | Karen Hughes |
| | Bob Waldron |
| | Rick Cywinski |
Footnote 1: Under the Sato contract, FDIC guarantees Sato a minimum profit of 1% of net air/rail sales, including expenses
incurred by SatoTravcl to provide the services required under the contract. Expenses and income (vendor
commissions) are netted against each ether to determine net operating expenses. Therefore a decrease in
commissions received from hotel bookings results in an overall increase in the amount Sato invoices the FDIC for
its services.
|